In Re Kehr
In the Matter of the Application of Thomas J. Kehr for Writ of Mandamus.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner's remedy is by proceeding in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).
All the Justices concurred.
*Page 402
Cited by
- Marshall v. State Civ. 8045 · 1952-03-14
- Gantner & Mattern Co. v. California Employment Commission Sac. No. 5406 · 1941-02-07