McGorray v. Superior Court
B. McGORRAY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, Respondent
- Proceeding
- writ
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Joaquin County
- Trial judge
- F. H. Smith
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. [S. F.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.— The petition for a writ of review shows that the defendant was sued in a justice’s court upon a contract for the payment of money, that he was served with summons and answered the complaint, that judgment was entered against him, that he appealed to the superior court on questions of law and fact, where, after a retrial, judgment was again entered against him. He contends that this judgment is void, because it does not appear from the complaint in the justice’s court, the docket, etc., that the action was commenced in the proper township, and consequently that the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction originally, and the superior court no jurisdiction on the appeal except to dismiss the action. It is not alleged that any objection to the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace was taken at the trial or at all, and it is expressly provided by subdivision 4 of section 890 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the objection that an action has not been commenced in the proper township is waived, if not taken at the trial. This section must be considered in connection with section 832 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and it provides for a mode of waiving objection to the jurisdiction fully as effective as a voluntary appearance without summons.
Writ denied.-