Tattenham v. Superior Court
Daniel Tattenham v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is a petition for the writ of certiorari. It is alleged that the petitioners have been enjoined in an action to which they were not parties, and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the court granting the injunction. If they can appeal it is conceded they have no right to the writ, and there is no doubt that they can appeal by making themselves parties in the manner pointed out in Elliott v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. 509, [103 Am. St. Rep. 102, 77 P. 1109].
Writ denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Elliott v. Superior Court L.A. No. 1587. · 1904-08-29
Cited by
- Burlingame v. Justice's Court S. F. 15042 · 1934-05-28
- Luckenbach v. Laer L. A. Nos. 7047, 7048. · 1923-02-09
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co. L.A. Nos. 2791-2792. · 1911-03-13