Miller v. Carlisle
William T. Miller v. J.O. Carlisle, Paul H. Boggs
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Butte County
- Trial judge
- John C. Gray
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the opinion rendered in the case of Miller v. Carlisle, ante, p. 327.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This appeal is by the defendant Boggs from the personal judgment in the action rendered against him and his codefendant Carlisle. The facts necessary to an understanding of the case are stated in the opinion rendered on the appeal (Sac. No. 584, ante, p. 327) from the order denying the motion of Carlisle for new trial. For the reasons there given it appears that the court below had no jurisdiction to render the judgment appealed from; the judgment is also erroneous in that it awards a recovery in favor of the plaintiffs jointly, their demands being several; it is therefore reversed.