California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith
California Midland Railway Company v. Chester A. Smith, Marshal and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, Etc., Defendants Waldo S. Johnson, John Martin v. Chester A. Smith, Marshal and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, Etc., Defendants Waldo S. Johnson
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Yuba County
- Trial judge
- Eugene P. McDaniel
- Outcome
- other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith Sac. No. 2574. Department Two. · 1918-09-05
Cited by
- Dunning Brothers Co. v. Johnson Civ. No. 2164. · 1920-05-07
- Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith Sac. No. 2574. Department Two. · 1918-09-05