Vickrey v. Jones
A.M. Vickrey v. Simon Maier and John T. Jones
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Charles Monroe
- Outcome
- reversed — The judgment is reversed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Shaw (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same in effect as in the second contract considered in the case of Vickrey v. Maier, ante, p. 384, [129 P. 273], this day decided. The parties to this appeal have stipulated that the decision of the appeal in that case shall control the decision here. Upon the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it is obvious that the judgment of the court below in this case for the defendants was erroneous.
The judgment is reversed.
Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.
*Page 775
Cites, in this corpus
- Vickrey v. Maier L.A. 2956. · 1912-12-23