Matter of Brown
In the Matter of the Application of Charles Brown on Habeas Corpus.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
There was evidence sufficiently shown, for the purpose of commitment for trial, that petitioner received money from another person to hold the same as a bet or wager on a proposed horse race. This was substantially the charge made by the complaint.
Section 337a of the Penal Code in terms makes it a crime for one to receive any money, bet or wagered, or offered for the purpose of being bet or wagered by or for any other person, upon the result of any trial or contest of speed between men or beasts.
We do not see why this case does not fall within this inhibition, nor do we see any reason to doubt the validity of the law.
The application for a writ is denied. *Page 633
Cited by
- County of Alameda v. Meadowlark Dairy Corp. Civ. 21385 · 1964-05-06
- Hollywood Turf Club v. Daugherty L. A. 21166 · 1950-11-17
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board L. A. 20332 · 1948-02-03
- People v. Sullivan Crim. 479 · 1943-09-23