Glide v. City of Sacramento
LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (A Municipal Corporation), Respondent
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Yolo County
- Trial judge
- W. A. Anderson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.
Hearing in Bank denied.
All the Justices present concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Finance & Construction Co. v. City of Sacramento Docket No. Sac. 3996. · 1928-07-11
Cited by
- Arcularius v. City of Los Angeles Civ. No. 5814 · 1938-01-13