gno.law

Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 1785, Sac. No. 1786, Sac. No. 1787, Sac. No. 1788, Sac. No. 1789, Sac. No. 1790, Sac. No. 1791, Sac. No. 1792, Sac. No. 1793, Sac. No. 1794. · 1911-01-10 · Published · 113 P. 174 · 159 Cal. 801 · 1911 Cal. LEXIS 386

Reclamation District No. 70 v. Wesley Blackmer, Reclamation District No. 70 v. J.W. Browning, Reclamation District No. 70 v. J.W. Smith, Reclamation District No. 70 v. C.R. Weis, Reclamation District No. 70 v. Elizabeth Winship, Reclamation District No. 70 v. J.W. Smith, Reclamation District No. 70 v. Oliver E. Winship, Reclamation District No. 70 v. Henry Wilder, Reclamation District No. 70 v. Charles Havens, Reclamation District No. 70 v. Henry Sills

Proceeding
appeal from judgments
Trial court
Superior Court of Sutter County
Trial judge
K. S. Mahon
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Reclamation District No. 70 v. Birks, ante, p.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

It having been stipulated that decisions in the above entitled cases should depend upon the decision in Reclamation District No.70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 P. 170], this day decided, and that such judgment of this court as might be made and given in the case of Reclamation District No. 70 v.John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [113 P. 170], should also be given in the above entitled cases.

It is ordered as to the above entitled cases, and each of them, that the judgment and order appealed from be reversed.

Hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases respectively denied.

Beatty, C.J., dissented from the respective orders denying a hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus