Latourette-Fiscal Co. v. Hanify
LATOURETTE-FISCAL CO. (A Corporation) Et Al., Respondents, v. DANIEL R. HANIFY, Defendant; ROY E. COLE, as County Treasurer, Etc., Et Al., Appellants; LATOURETTE-FISCAL CO. (A Corporation) Et Al., Respondents, v. GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY (A Corporation), Appellant; LANNOM BROTHERS MFG. CO. (A Corporation), Respondent, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARKSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF YOLO COUNTY Et Al., Defendants and Respondents; GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Yolo County
- Trial judge
- W. A. Anderson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The above consolidated cases arise out of the same transaction set forth in consolidated cases No. 4598, Globe Indemnity Co.
v. Hanify, ante, p. 721 [20 Pac. (2d) 689], this day decided, and, therefore, come within the rule announced therein. Each judgment appealed from herein is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set out in said consolidated eases No. 4598.
It is so ordered.
Rehearing denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Hanify Docket No. Sac. 4598. · 1933-04-03