Dozier v. Chipman
Thomas B. Dozier, Jr. v. W.F. Chipman, as Trustee, Etc.
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- Frank J. Murasky
- Outcome
- reversed — Reversed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a companion case to the action of Davis v. Chipman (S.F. No. 13122), ante, p. 609 [293 P. 40], this day decided. In that action the facts involved in the present action are fully set forth as well as the nature of the plaintiff's demand. It is not necessary to repeat them here. [1] Upon the authority ofDavis v. Chipman, supra, the judgment herein is reversed.
Rehearing denied.
Shenk, J., and Preston, J., dissented. *Page 669 APPENDIX. BEFORE THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Cites, in this corpus
- Davis v. Chipman Docket No. S.F. 13122. · 1930-10-30