gno.law

Dixon v. Dixon

California Supreme Court · Docket No. L.A. 13590. · 1932-09-27 · Published · 14 P.2d 498 · 216 Cal. 443 · 1932 Cal. LEXIS 588

NELLE C. DIXON, Respondent, v. WINFIELD EUGENE DIXON, Etc., Appellant

Proceeding
appeal from an order
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Dudley G. Valentine
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
John W. Preston (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Preston

PRESTON, J.

Plaintiff, on January 5, 1932, secured judgment in action L. A. No. 13564 (ante, p. 440 [14 Pac. (2d) 497]) ordering defendant to pay the sum of $75 per month for the maintenance and support of the minor adopted daughter of these parties, together with $150 counsel fees and costs, from which defendant appealed. Plaintiff thereupon instituted this proceeding on motion to secure support and maintenance for the minor child pending appeal from said judgment, together with further counsel fees and costs. Defendant resisted the motion; the matter was heard and on January 26, 1932, the court gave its order directing defendant to pay, pending said appeal, the sum of $75 per month for the support of said child and $300 counsel fees, all monthly payments so made to be credited upon said judgment in the event of its affirmance. Defendant thereupon appealed from said order.

The action of the court below in so providing for the support and maintenance of the minor pending determination of the appeal from the judgment in the main case was proper (Sheppard v. Sheppard, 161 Cal. 348 [119 Pac. 492]). The order is therefore affirmed.

Shenk, J., Tyler, J., pro te to., Langdon, J., Waste, C. J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by