Fresno Canal Etc. Co. v. William Ede Co.
Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company v. William Ede Company
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Fresno County
- Trial judge
- H. Z. Austin
- Outcome
- reversed — order are reversed and the cause remanded.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This action is in all respects like the action of Fresno Canaland Irrigation Company, plaintiff and respondent, v. Marcus Hartet al., defendants and appellants, No. 4372, ante, p. 450, [92 P. 1010], this day decided. The defendant was the successor in interest to certain lands originally owned by Hart and affected by the water contracts in suit. The cause has been submitted to follow the determination in the Hart case, and for the reasons there given the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.
Cites, in this corpus
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Hart S.F. No. 4372. · 1907-12-03