Hackel v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles
E.M. Hackel v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles
- Outcome
- writ granted — PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles and Charles L. Bogue, Judge thereof, to terminate the prosecution of petitioner on a misdemeanor charge. Peremptory writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] This is a proceeding in mandate similar in all essential particulars to the preceding cases of Harris v. Municipal Courtet al. (L.A. No. 11787), ante, p. 55 [285 P. 699], and Gutterman v. Municipal Court et al. (L.A. No. 11605), ante, p. 65 [295 P. 703], this day *Page 781 decided. The complaint against the petitioner for usury, a misdemeanor, was filed in the respondent court on September 23, 1927, and the warrant was served on April 18, 1929, and nothing was done by the prosecution in the meantime to bring the case on for trial. Proceedings similar to those in the other cases were taken in the respondent court to bring about a dismissal of the action with like result. On the authority of those cases the peremptory writ of mandamus is ordered issued as prayed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A. Docket No. L.A. 11787. · 1930-02-24