Pacific Orient v. Sup. Ct. of City Cty. of San Fran.
Pacific Orient Company (A Corporation) v. the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Outcome
- writ denied — APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain respondent from certain proceedings. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASE. THE COURT.
[1] Application for a writ of prohibition directing the respondent Superior Court to desist from further proceedings in an action brought to compel the petitioner here to submit a dispute or controversy to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract entered into before the present law on arbitration became effective. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1280 et seq., Stats. 1927, page 404.) The petition is denied on the authority of Inthe Matter of the Application of Berkovitz v. Arbib Houlberg, 230 N.Y. 261 [130 N.E. 288]; Red Cross Line v.Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U.S. 109 [68 L.Ed. 582, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174]. (All concur.)
Rehearing denied.
All the Justices concurred.
*Page 1
Cited by
- Clogston v. Schiff-Lang Co., Inc. L. A. 12798 · 1935-02-01