gno.law

Eichler v. Tedford

California Supreme Court · L.A. No. 3009. · 1912-03-02 · Published · 122 P. 1128 · 162 Cal. 762 · 1912 Cal. LEXIS 597

Maime L. Eichler, as Administratrix With the Will Annexed of the Estate of Emily J. Tedford v. Sarah J. Tedford, as of the Estate of Asa C. Tedford

Proceeding
appeal from an order
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Walter Bordwell
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Tedford v. Eichler, ante, p. 214, [ 121 P.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler, (L.A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [121 P. 730], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the order appealed from is affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.

Cites, in this corpus