People v. Day
The People v. William Day
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- F. B. Ogden
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The defendant was charged by the information with having committed the infamous crime against nature, was tried by a jury and found guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment at San Quentin for the term of ten years, and he now appeals from said judgment and an order denying a new trial.
The transcript consists of the judgment-roll and notice of appeal, without any statement or bill of exceptions. Upon the trial he had the aid of competent counsel, but no brief *Page 361 has been filed in his behalf. The information was not objected to, and appears to be sufficient, nor do we discover any errors in the instructions given to the jury or in the proceedings.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.