Pacific W. S. Co. v. Los Angeles Co.
Pacific Wharf Storage Company (A Corporation) v. County of Los Angeles (A Municipal Corporation), Pacific Wharf Storage Company (A Corporation) v. County of Los Angeles (A Municipal Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judges
- John W. Shenk; Leslie R. Hewitt
- Outcome
- reversed — Reversed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Plaintiff in both actions is lessee of certain tide-lands belonging to the state and situated in the county of Los Angeles, which assessed the leasehold and levied a tax thereon. Plaintiff paid the tax under protest, and in due time sued to recover the same.
Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.
[1] The sole question involved is whether a leasehold interest in tide and submerged lands owned by the state is subject to assessment and taxation under the revenue laws thereof. The subject is fully discussed and answered in the affirmative by what is said in the opinion in the case ofSan Pedro, Los Angeles Salt Lake R. R. Co. v. City of LosAngeles, ante, p. 18, [179 P. 393], which involved a like *Page 32 question. Upon the authority thereof, the judgments in both cases are reversed.
Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., Sloss, J., Wilbur, J., Richards, J., pro tem., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los Angeles L. A. No. 4600. · 1919-02-25
Cited by
- Ross v. City of Long Beach L. A. 18674 · 1944-05-02
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co. L. A. No. 4954. · 1919-10-08