Welk v. Sorenson
Theodore J. Welk v. Albert Sorenson
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Grant Jackson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Henry A. Melvin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order refusing to credit the sum of $15 costs (for which judgment had been entered in favor of Grace A. Sorenson) upon a judgment against her codefendant in the same action, Albert Sorenson, the appellant basing the argument against the order largely upon the case ofAdams v. Baker, 24 Nev. 375, [55 P. 362].
The appeal is by the alternative method, but appellant neither prints any of the record in the brief nor designates in any way the parts of the transcript upon which the alleged "statement of facts" is based. We will not, therefore, consider the brief. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c; Estate of Keith,175 Cal. 26, [165 P. 10]; Miller v. Oliver, 174 Cal. 404, [163 P. 357].)
Order affirmed.
Wilbur, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- In Re Estate of Keith S. F. No. 7965. · 1917-04-30
- Miller v. Oliver Sac. No. 2325. · 1917-02-13
Cited by
- Arthur v. Fetterman Civ. No. 2898. · 1919-07-02
- Roberts v. Allen Civ. No. 2915. · 1919-06-07
- City Street Improvement Co. v. Silvershield Civ. No. 2749. · 1919-04-08
- Whiting-Mead Com. Co. v. Richards Civ. No. 2071. Second Appellate District, Division Two. · 1919-03-13
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Richards Civ. No. 2071 · 1919-03-13