Buckley v. Carlisle
S. BUCKLEY, Appellant, v. D. CARLISLE, Respondent
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- other — The Court ordered judgment to be entered in favour of the defendant with costs; and plaintiff appealed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Heydenfeldt, Justice.
This was an action for the recovery of personal property. The jury found specially that the plaintiff and defendant were partners in reference to the subject-matter of the suit. The mere statement of the finding is sufficient to show that the plaintiff had no right to recover. The property was as rightfully in the possession of the defendant, as it would have been in the plaintiffs; and there being in the bill no allegation of partnership, and no attempt to seek a dissolution and an account, it follows that there was no relief, to which the plaintiff was entitled; and the judgment is therefore affirmed with costs.
Cited by
- Mosher v. Helfend Civ. 9102 · 1935-05-16
- De Rigne v. Hart Docket No. 3560. · 1928-09-29
- Balch v. Jones No. 8,314 · 1882-08-16