The People v. Dunleavy
The People v. Frank Dunleavy, the People v. Henry Freedman, the People v. A. Johnson, the People v. Joseph Smith
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- George H. Cabaniss
- Outcome
- other — The facts are similar to those stated in People v. Plath, ante, p. 227.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Each of the appeals in the above entitled causes presents the same questions that are presented in People v. Plath, (Crim. No. 1784), ante, p. 227, [135 P. 954.] Upon the authority of the last named case, the action of the trial court in each of the above entitled cases must be affirmed.
The judgments appealed from are affirmed. *Page 780
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Plath Crim. No. 1784. · 1913-09-30