gno.law

Estate of Russell

California Supreme Court · S.F. No. 256. · 1906-03-14 · Published · 84 P. 155 · 148 Cal. 768 · 1906 Cal. LEXIS 368

In the Matter of the Estate of Robert Russell

Area
probate
Panel
The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

A petition has been filed in this cause for an order to transfer the appeal to this court; the appeal having, as it is claimed, been erroneously taken to the district court of appeal. The court desires to state what they consider the correct practice in cases where the notice is of an appeal to the wrong court. In all such cases, of course, the appellant will file the record in the court to which his appeal has been taken, and the proper practice is to make the motion to transfer in that court. Until the cause is transferred, the matter is pending there, and that court, whether the supreme court or the district court of appeal, is, as we construe the constitutional *Page 769 provision on the subject, authorized to make the proper order for the transfer of the cause.

For this reason alone the petition is denied.