Strong, Albert v. Shatto
W.A. Strong, George C. Albert (Substituted) v. Clara A. Shatto, Defendants G. Allan Hancock
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Charles D. Burnell
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] The parties to this appeal having stipulated that the same may stand submitted upon the briefs on file in the causes ofW.A. Strong, George C. Albert, Substituted, Plaintiff andAppellant, v. G. Allan Hancock et al., Defendants andRespondents, ante, p. 530 [258 P. 60], and W.A. Strong,George C. Albert, Substituted, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.Clara A. Shatto et al., Defendants; John G. Bullock et al.,Defendants and Appellants, ante, p. 555 [258 P. 71], and having further stipulated that no other questions are presented upon this appeal than those presented and decided in the aforesaid causes, it is hereby ordered, upon the authority of the decisions in said causes this day filed, that the judgment, in so far as the appellants herein are affected thereby, is affirmed.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Strong v. Shatto Docket No. L.A. 8530. · 1927-07-02
- Strong v. Hancock Docket No. L.A. 8555. · 1927-07-02