Heazelton v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company

California Supreme Court · S. F. No. 8022. S. F. No. 8023. S. F. No. 8024. S. F. No. 8025. S. F. No. 8026. S. F. No. 8027. S. F. No. 8144. S. F. No. 8145. S. F. No. 8146. S. F. No. 8147. S. F. No. 8148. S. F. No. 8150. S. F. No. 8151. · 1918-10-14 · Published · 175 P. 695 · 179 Cal. 812

Mary B. Heazelton v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company, J. B. Feustmann v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company, J. A. Fairchild v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company, M. P. Lilienthal v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company, Henry H. Meyers v. Monterey County Gas and Electric Company

Proceeding: appeal from judgments
Trial court: Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge: J. M. Seawell
Outcome: affirmed — Affirmed.
Area: civil
Panel: The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

In each of the above-entitled cases the judgment is affirmed, on the authority of San Francisco Theological Seminary v.Monterey County Gas and Electric Co., ante, p. 166, [175 P. 693]. *Page 815

Cites, in this corpus

S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co. S. F. No. 8149. · 1918-10-14