gno.law

Christensen v. Couey

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1290. · 1934-01-15 · Published · 28 P.2d 689 · 136 Cal. App. 268 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1046

Douglas Christensen, a Minor, Etc. v. E.J. Couey

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Fresno County
Trial judge
H. Z. Austin
Outcome
dismissed — Appeal dismissed.
Area
civil
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal on the ground that no transcript has been filed. [1] It appears by certificate of the county clerk that notice of request for the preparation of a transcript was filed on January 16, 1933; that no transcript has been filed pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure or otherwise; that any proceedings in the trial court for the preparation of a transcript were terminated by order of court on September 1, 1933; that no additional time within which to prepare or serve a draft of a bill of exceptions has been allowed by the superior court or any judge thereof; that no proceedings for the preparation of a bill of exceptions or a transcript are pending in the trial court; and that the time within which to institute any such proceedings has expired. The motion should therefore be granted (Steffey v. StandardStations, Inc., 131 Cal.App. 202 [20 P.2d 971]).

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred. *Page 269

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by