gno.law

In Re Beers

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1863. · 1929-09-27 · Published · 280 P. 1033 · 100 Cal. App. 796 · 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 400

In the Matter of the Application of Donald B. Beers for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Proceeding
original
Outcome
other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Area
other
Panel
Frederick W. Houser (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Through the medium of a writ of habeas corpus issued by order of this court, the father of a minor child (petitioner herein) seeks its custody.

[1] By the answer and return to the writ it appears that in a former habeas corpus proceeding instituted in the Superior Court by the petitioner herein in behalf of the same minor child, on the identical state of facts as are alleged in this proceeding, and against the same persons who are respondents herein, the writ was discharged. That such order constitutes a final adjudication as to the parties in this proceeding is squarely decided in each of the cases entitled In re Holt,34 Cal.App. 290 [167 P. 184], In re Frazier, 50 Cal.App. 45 [194 P. 510], and In re Gille, 65 Cal.App. 617 [224 P. 784].

The writ is discharged.

Conrey, P.J., and York, J., concurred. *Page 797

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by