gno.law

Percy v. Allen

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 561. · 1931-12-09 · Published · 6 P.2d 88 · 119 Cal. App. 106 · 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 110

Margaret Percy v. Lillian M. Allen

Proceeding
appeal from an order
Trial court
Superior Court of Riverside County
Trial judge
O.K. Morton
Outcome
dismissed — Dismissed.
Area
civil
Panel
Marks (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Appellants gave the following notice of appeal in the court below: "Notice is hereby given that the plaintiffs do hereby appeal to the Supreme Court of the State of California from the order of the above entitled court made and entered on Monday, the 29th day of December, 1930, sustaining defendant's demurrer to the first amended complaint of the plaintiff above named, and from the whole thereof." As the case is within the appellate jurisdiction of this court it was transferred here for decision.

[1] Under the provisions of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an appeal cannot be taken from an order sustaining a demurrer. An attempted appeal from such an order fails to give any jurisdiction to the appellate court to entertain it and must be dismissed. (Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721 [265 P. 817];Tyler v. City Council of Huntington Park et al., 97 Cal.App. 724 [276 P. 355]; O'Neill v. Hicks, 101 Cal.App. 374 [281 P. 531].)

Appeal dismissed.

Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred. *Page 107

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by