Miller v. Motor Coach Company
Cora Miller v. Motor Coach Company (A Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- H. S. Gans
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Craig (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
As the result of three actions which arose from allegedly negligent operation of a motor-bus and a private automobile at an intersection of public thoroughfares, consolidated for the purposes of trial, judgments were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants presented appeals separately upon the same transcript. The instant appeal is from one of said judgments, entered in favor of a passenger of said automobile.
[1] The questions involved herein are identical with those decided in the case of Harlow v. Motor Coach Co., (Civil No. 7246) ante, p. 728 [16 P.2d 779]. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Harlow v. Motor Coach Co. Docket No. 7246. · 1932-11-29