gno.law

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 8881. · 1933-05-16 · Published · 22 P.2d 26 · 132 Cal. App. 39 · 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 240

Benjamin Franklin Bond Indemnity Corporation (A Corporation) v. Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge of the Superior Court, Etc.

Proceeding
writ
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Ruben S. Schmidt
Outcome
dismissed — Dismissed.
Area
civil
Panel
John D. Works (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] The writ of review was improperly issued in this proceeding. After return made to the writ our attention is first called in the briefs to the fact that the petition for the writ was unverified. The writ of review can be issued only upon a verified petition. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1069.)

[2] As we have so often said under similar circumstances, respondent judge is not a proper party to the proceeding.

The writ and the accompanying restraining order are set aside and the proceeding is dismissed.

Stephens, J., and Parker, J., pro tem., concurred.

Cited by