gno.law

Goodman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1216. · 1912-07-13 · Published · 126 P. 185 · 19 Cal. App. 457

S. B. GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and N. P. CONREY, One of the Judges Thereof, Respondents

Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The affidavit discloses that a certain judgment was rendered against petitioner, as defendant in a certain action brought in the justice’s court, on the seventh day of March, 1912, for the sum of $234.60; that thereafter, on the fourteenth day of March, an undertaking was filed in the justice’s court staying execution on said judgment, and also an undertaking on appeal; that on the third day of April following a notice of appeal was filed, and thereafter the amount required by law to be paid for the filing of papers on appeal was duly paid; that thereafter, on July 1st, the superior court dismissed the appeal. This application prays for a writ directing the respondents to vacate and set aside the order made and entered dismissing the appeal. We are of opinion that this writ should be denied upon the authority of Rigby v. Superior Court, 162 Cal. 334, [122 Pac. 958];

W. P. Jeffreys & Co.

v. Superior Court, 13 Cal. App. 193, [109 Pac. 147], and Stimpson Scale Co.

v. Superior Court, 12 Cal. App. 539, [107 Pac. 1013].

Application for writ denied.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by