Rose v. Lelande
Ruth M. Rose v. H. J. Lelande, Clerk of Los Angeles County and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles
- Proceeding
- writ
- Outcome
- writ denied — The writ is denied.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This application must be denied for two reasons: First, there is no duty devolving by law upon the clerk to certify or attest the transcript containing the reporter's notes, or the papers desired to be included therein, not included in the judgment-roll. Second, the notice of appeal is from an order of court setting aside a default. This is not an appealable order.
The writ is denied.
Cited by
- Hughson v. Superior Court Docket No. 8318. · 1932-02-11
- Mercantile Banking Co. v. Hernandez Docket No. 873. · 1931-10-16
- Mercantile Banking Co. v. Hernandez Civ. No. 873 · 1931-10-16