People v. Jonas
The People v. Henry v. Jonas
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Elliot Craig
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Nathaniel P. Conrey (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The information charged against defendant that he committed the crime of burglary, a felony, by entering certain described premises "with the intent then and there and therein to commit the crime of larceny." Judgment was entered against him, pursuant to a plea of guilty. He now claims that the information did not charge the commission of any crime.
[1] The only point in the case is identical with that presented to this court in People v. Giron, ante, p. 53 [270 P. 462]. In that case we held against the contention of appellant, and the supreme court has denied a petition for rehearing.
The judgment is affirmed.
Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Giron Docket No. 1699. · 1928-09-19