gno.law

Hill v. Hoefer

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 411. · 1908-04-07 · Published · 96 P. 116 · 8 Cal. App. 70 · 1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 61

Samuel Hill v. Joseph Hoefer

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Shasta County
Trial judge
Charles M. Head
Outcome
reversed — order are reversed.
Area
civil
Panel
Hart (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The facts and the law involved in this case are admittedly the same as those involved in Hill v. Barner etc. et al., No. 410, this day decided.

A motion was made to dismiss the appeal in this case, but the same is without merit, and is, therefore, denied.

Upon the authority of Hill v. Barner et al., ante, p. 58, [96 P. 111], and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment and order are reversed.

Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 71

Cites, in this corpus