gno.law

Kendis v. Cohn

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 6183. · 1928-03-10 · Published · 265 P. 855 · 90 Cal. App. 796 · 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 169

Minnie Kendis v. A.B. Cohn

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Walter Perry Johnson
Outcome
reversed in part — Presiding. Reversed in part; affirmed in part.
Area
civil
Panel
Joseph B. Campbell (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic>

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE. This is an appeal from portions of the judgment entered declaratory of the rights of the parties relative to the assignment of a certain lease and adjudging that plaintiff take nothing by way of damages. [1] The questions presented on this appeal are passed upon in the case of Minnie Kendis, Plaintiffand Respondent, v. A.B. Cohn, Lulu B. Cohn, M.B. Cohn andHattie B. Cohn, Defendants and Appellants (No. 6182), ante, p. 41 [265 P. 844], and on the authority of that case the judgment here is reversed and affirmed as the questions here presented and determind in that case, respondents to recover their costs on this appeal.

Tyler, P.J., and Knight, J., concurred.

A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 7, 1928.

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by