Maddox v. Hogin
Irma Fay Maddox v. G.M. Hogin
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] It satisfactorily appearing from the certificate of the clerk of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County wherein the above-entitled action was tried, that judgment was rendered on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1931; that on the tenth day of April, 1931, the plaintiff filed notice of appeal to this court, under the provisions of section 953, Code of Civil Procedure; that on *Page 231 April 10, 1931, a request was made of the shorthand reporter to prepare a transcript of the testimony taken in said cause; that no undertaking has been filed with the court for costs on appeal; that no proceedings for a bill of exceptions are pending in the trial court; that there is on file in said court an order terminating proceedings to obtain a transcript on appeal, which was entered on the ninth day of November, 1931.
From which it follows that the appeal in this cause should be dismissed. And it is so ordered.