gno.law

Willett v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 3493. · 1928-04-24 · Published · 266 P. 1028 · 91 Cal. App. 798 · 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 1026

WALTER M. WILLETT, Appellant, v. PEPPERS COTTON LUMBER COMPANY (A Corporation) Et Al., Respondents

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Siskiyou County
Trial judge
C. J. Luttrell
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Bartlett (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Bartlett

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

This appeal by plaintiff from orders of the superior court of Siskiyou County, sustaining without leave to amend, demurrers of defendants, other than Peppers Cotton Lumber Company, to plaintiff’s complaint, and from the judgments entered in said action, involves the same issues of law as were raised and presented in the case of P. L. Burr v. Peppers Cotton Lumber Co. (a *799 California, Corporation) et. al., ante, p. 268 [266 Pac. 1025]. the decision in which is this day filed. It was stipulated in this case that the briefs filed in the Burr case should be considered in the determination of this appeal.

Upon the authority of the decision in said ease, the judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Hart, Acting P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 24, 1928, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 21, 1928.

All the Justices concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by