Schmidt v. Yoakum

California Court of Appeal · Civ. Nos. 2596, 2597. · 1918-12-09 · Published · 178 P. 318 · 39 Cal. App. 790 · 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 128

Gilbert Schmidt v. John E. Yoakum, Gilbert Schmidt v. John E. Yoakum Company (A Corporation)

Proceeding: appeal from orders
Trial court: Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge: Lewis R. Works
Outcome: affirmed — Affirmed.
Area: civil
Panel: Nathaniel P. Conrey (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

In each of these cases the plaintiff appeals from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The only questions presented for determination are included among those considered by this court in Schmidt v. Santa Monica Commercial Co., ante, p. 785, [178 P. 315], in which the decision of the court has been this day filed. [1] On the authority of that decision, the orders granting the motions for new trial in the above-entitled actions numbered 2596 and 2597 are and each of them is affirmed.

James, J., and Myers, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 791 A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 6, 1919.

All the Justices concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Schmidt v. Santa Monica Commercial Co. Civ. No. 2588, Civ. No. 2589, Civ. No. 2590, Civ. No. 2591. · 1918-12-09