gno.law

Doon v. Walcott

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 4420. · 1923-05-28 · Published · 216 P. 1117 · 62 Cal. App. 797 · 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 574

James M. Doon v. Earle A. Walcott

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Walter Perry Johnson
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
John T. Nourse (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant's petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, constituting the Civil Service Commission of the city and county of San Francisco, to restore his name to a place upon the register of candidates eligible to appointment to the position of general clerk in the classified civil service of the city and county of San Francisco. The appeal is submitted on the record in Gilbert v. Civil Service Com., 61 Cal.App. 459 [215 P. 97]. No briefs are filed upon this appeal and therefore nothing new is presented for consideration.

[1] Upon the authority of the Gilbert case the judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus