gno.law

Stuart v. Coffrin

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3643. · 1920-12-23 · Published · 195 P. 702 · 50 Cal. App. 804 · 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 155

Z. B. Stuart v. Kissiah Coffrin

Proceeding
appeal from an order
Trial court
Superior Court of Monterey County
Trial judge
J. A. Bardin
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

It is stipulated by the parties to this appeal that the facts are identical with those of the case entitled"Z. B. Stuart v. Rose Everly," ante, p. 551, [195 P. 701], and in which the order appealed from was affirmed. For the reasons given at length in that opinion the same result must follow in this case.

The order is affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus