Garin v. Pelton
H. P. Garin v. Allen E. Pelton
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- Af S. Sure
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John T. Nourse (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
[1] This is an appeal from a judgment adverse to plaintiff in an action seeking to prohibit respondents from closing a certain street in San Leandro. Respondents insist that the proceedings which appellant sought to prohibit were not judicial. The proceedings are the same as those considered inGarin v. Pelton, ante, p. 672 [209 P. 377]. It was there held that certiorari would not lie to review the proceedings because they were not judicial, and for the same reason prohibition cannot lie.
The judgment is affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on October 2, 1922.
All the Justices present concurred.
Richards, J., pro tem., was acting. *Page 675
Cites, in this corpus
- Garin v. Pelton Civ. No. 4186. · 1922-08-04