Stuart v. Espinosa
Z. B. Stuart v. Manuel D. Espinosa
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Monterey County
- Trial judge
- J. A. Bardin
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
It has been stipulated by the parties to this appeal that the facts are identical with those of the case entitled "Z. B. Stuart v. Rose Everly," ante, p. 551, [195 P. 701], and in which the order appealed from was affirmed. For the reasons given at length in that opinion the same result must follow in this case.
The order is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Stuart v. Everly Civ. No. 3642. · 1920-12-23