gno.law

People v. Riley

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1156. · 1931-06-17 · Published · 1 P.2d 27 · 115 Cal. App. 765 · 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 739

The People v. Mike Riley

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Butte County
Trial judge
H. D. Gregory
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.

The defendant in this case was jointly tried with Frank Countryman, J.D. Countryman and Lige Taylor.

The jury found him guilty of operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. A motion for a new trial was made and denied by the court. Judgment was imposed and a separate appeal taken.

[1] The points raised for a reversal of the judgment are identical with those presented on the appeal of Frank Countryman, J.D. Countryman and Lige Taylor. On the sixteenth day of June, 1931, we determined all questions raised adversely to appellant's contentions. Therefore, upon the authority of People v.Countryman, ante, p. 36 [300 P. 871], the judgment and order denying a new trial in this case are hereby affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on July 1, 1931. *Page 766

Cites, in this corpus