Lohr v. Delta Land and Water Company
JOHN W. LOHR, Respondent, v. DELTA LAND AND WATER COMPANY (A Corporation), Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Frank R. Willis
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Action to enforce rescission of a contract for the purchase of real property and of certain shares of corporation stock; and for other relief. The ease is similar to three others in which decisions of this court are being filed at this time. They are number 3590, Delta Land & Water Co.
v. Perry et al., ante, p. 314 [207 Pac. 393]; number 3591, Scott et al.
v. Delta Land & Water Co. et al., ante, p. 320 [207 Pac. 389], and number 3593, Bradley et al.
v. Delta Land & Water Co. et al., ante, p. 790 [207 Pac. 395], This case differs from the others only in that it relates to a different contract and different property. The alleged false and fraudulent representations made by the defendants and their agents and the various eircum *790 stances of the transactions are so much alike that a separate statement of the particular facts of this ease is not necessary.
On the authority of the decisions above mentioned the judgment is affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 8, 1922.
All the Justices concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Scott v. Delta Land & Water Co. Civ. No. 3591. · 1922-04-11
- Delta Land & Water Co. v. Perry Civ. No. 3590. · 1922-04-11
- Bradley v. Delta Land and Water Company Civ. No. 3593. · 1922-04-11