gno.law

S. F. Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 645. · 1909-11-10 · Published · 106 P. 113 · 11 Cal. App. 701

San Francisco Sulphur Company, a Corporation v. Aetna Indemnity Company, (Superior Court No. 11).

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
George H. Buck
Outcome
affirmed — order are affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Frank H. Kerrigan (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

In the above-entitled cause it has been stipulated by the respective parties that the matters to be determined by this court are identical with the matters to be determined in the cause bearing the same title but numbered in the trial court No. 3619, ante, p. 695, [106 P. 111], and that the judgment of this court may be the same in both cases. In the case numbered in the trial court No. 3619 we have this day affirmed the judgment and order appealed from. It is therefore ordered in accordance with the aforesaid stipulation that in the case numbered No. 11 in the trial court, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred. *Page 702

Cites, in this corpus