People v. Page
The People v. Frank Page, Defendants National Surety Company (A Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- James G. Conlan
- Outcome
- reversed — Reversed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George A. Sturtevant (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
In this case the information so pleaded the facts as to state a different offense under a different statute. Otherwise all of the facts are the same as those involved in People v. Page, ante, p. 252 [279 P. 1059].
For the reasons stated in that case the judgment is reversed.
Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Page Docket No. 6631. · 1929-08-05