People v. Heck
The PEOPLE, Respondent, v. VICTOR HECK, Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- Everett J. Brown
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. [Crim. No.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The defendant was charged with the crime of passing a fictitious check. Upon the trial he was convicted, and this is his appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The case was upon the calendar for oral argument May 9, 1910, at which time no one appeared for the defendant, but upon the suggestion of the attorney general that it had been *678 agreed between the attorney general and the counsel for the defendant that the defendant might have fifteen days in which to file a brief, such time was given. He did not file any brief within the time allowed, nor has any extension of time been asked or granted. The case was therefore submitted for the decision of this court.
As we have not been apprised, either by an oral argument or by any brief, of the grounds upon which appellant claims that either the judgment or order should be reversed, we do not feel called upon to search the record for error which possibly might justify a reversal of either the judgment or the order.
The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.
Cited by
- Wright v. Yosemite Transportation Co. Civ. No. 1393. · 1915-08-28