People v. Hernandez
The People v. Eular Hernandez
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- Fred V. Wood
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George A. Sturtevant (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
[1] The defendant appealed from a judgment of conviction for grand theft. The transcript was filed in this court and the cause was on the calendar May 12, 1930, for the purpose of hearing argument. At that time it transpired that there were no briefs on file and the defendant's counsel did not appear. An order was made giving the defendant ten (10) days to file her brief and if said brief was not filed within that time then the cause *Page 434 should stand submitted. On default of said filing said cause stood submitted May 27, 1930.
As the judgment appealed from is presumed to be correct and as our attention is not called to any error said judgment is affirmed.
Nourse, P.J., and Spence, J., concurred.