gno.law

Walsh v. Flatland

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2367 · 1918-04-16 · Published · 173 P. 596 · 36 Cal. App. 819 · 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 527

Patrick J. Walsh v. M. Flatland

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
Daniel C. Deasy
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion of the court in Crittenden v. Murphy, ante, p. 803.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This case presents the same question of law as was raised in Crittenden v. Murphy, ante, p. 803, [173 P. 595]. The lower court took the same view of the law as did this court in Crittenden v. Murphy, and found on ample evidence that at the time of the injury the son was driving defendant's automobile with his father's implied consent, *Page 820 and further found that the son did not have the license to operate an automobile required by the Motor Vehicle Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 639), which act contained a provision identical with that quoted in Crittenden v. Murphy. Accordingly the court gave judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 14, 1918.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by