Egenberger v. the United Properties Co.
Carolina Egenberger, Etc. v. the United Properties Company of California (A Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Alameda County
- Trial judge
- Dudley Kinsell
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John T. Nourse (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Plaintiff recovered judgment for forty-seven thousand dollars and interest against the defendant for breach of its contract to deliver certain bonds. The facts of the case are similar to those considered in Knabbe v. United Properties Company ofCalifornia, ante, p. 434, [200 P. 369], and by stipulation of counsel this appeal has been submitted upon the same set of briefs.
For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred. *Page 800
Cites, in this corpus
- Knabbe v. United Properties Co. Civ. No. 3820. · 1921-07-07