gno.law

Sahakian v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 4884. · 1928-05-14 · Published · 267 P. 571 · 91 Cal. App. 737 · 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 935

John Sahakian v. City of Los Angeles

Proceeding
appeal
Trial judge
Ira F. Thompson
Outcome
dismissed — Appeal dismissed.
Area
civil
Panel
Hazlett (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic>

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Plaintiff states in his opening brief in his appeal herein that defendant City of Los Angeles *Page 738 filed a general demurrer to his complaint, which the trial court sustained without granting him leave to amend, and that "our only alternative is this appeal." [1] From this statement we understand that he attempts to appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, and his notice of appeal shows that he appeals from the order and not from the judgment thereon. Such order is not one from which an appeal lies. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.; People v. Goodell, 72 Cal.App. 452 [237 P. 829]; 2 Cal. Jur. 156.)

The attorney for appellants in this case was substituted after the appeal was taken, and after the briefs were filed.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by